BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs iPhone 16: Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A)
iPhone 16
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) wins 2 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedBBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A)9080
- CameraiPhone 166082
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A)7858
- DisplayiPhone 166264
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has the bigger battery4,800 mAh vs 3,561 mAh
- BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has the bigger screen6.53" vs 6.1"
- iPhone 16 is lighter170 g vs 279 g
- BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- iPhone 16 has the faster chipApple A18 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 5G SM8550-AB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+1,239 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 · Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+1,239 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 20W vs max 0W · Higher resolution main sensor: 48 MP vs max 0 MP
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) or iPhone 16?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to iPhone 16 (71.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.7 and Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+1,239 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) and iPhone 16?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has a 6.53-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. iPhone 16 has a 6.1-inch display and 3561 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) and iPhone 16 compare for speed?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) scores 90/100 for performance; iPhone 16 scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 15 Plus
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)
BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)
Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 17
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 15 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 16e
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
iPhone 16 vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →