BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)9095
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A)7870
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has the bigger battery4,800 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has the bigger screen6.53" vs 6.49"
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) is lighter215 g vs 279 g
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 5G SM8550-AB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) wins — BeastScore 72.3/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+400 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+400 mAh more)
More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB · Lighter body: 215g (64g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) or Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,800 mAh (+400 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) has a 6.53-inch display and 4800 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) and Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) scores 90/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) scores 95/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)

iPhone 16
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Mi 14 Civi 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 24053PY09I (Xiaomi Chenfeng)

BBK vivo iQOO 11S 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2304A (BBK V2304A)

Oppo Reno10 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU V3 256GB CPH2521 (BBK 2521)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs iPhone 16
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 16
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW Global TD-LTE 512GB G9FPL (Google Felix)
BBK Vivo X Fold2 5G 2023 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2266A (BBK V2266A) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Samsung SM-F966J Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 1TB SCG34 (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →