BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687): Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2022

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) wins 0 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)
0 wins
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    80
    80
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    86
    86
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.51"
  • Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) is lighter187 g vs 198 g
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)
  • ✓6.51" display
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
  • ✓11 g lighter (187 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.67" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.51"6.67"
Resolution & Density720x1600 (269 ppi)1080x2400 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 SM6225-AD (6nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2Qualcomm Adreno 610
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight198 g187 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

Buy BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) if you want

Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Buy Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) if you want

Lighter body: 187g (11g lighter in hand)

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) or Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)?

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Vivo hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) and Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)?

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) and Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) scores 80/100 for performance; Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?Hardware Pick
9 min read

ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?

ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.

Read →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture Showdown
18 min read

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)

We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →