BeastCompare

Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687): Which One Should You Buy?

Oppo Reno12 (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno12 (China)

Oppo Reno12 (China)
85/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Oppo Reno12 (China) wins 4 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Oppo Reno12 (China)
Oppo Reno12 (China)
4 wins
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Oppo Reno12 (China)Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedOppo Reno12 (China)
    86
    80
  • CameraOppo Reno12 (China)
    80
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    86
    86
  • DisplayOppo Reno12 (China)
    89
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOppo Reno12 (China)
    85
    68
Key differences
  • Oppo Reno12 (China) has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
  • Oppo Reno12 (China) is lighter185 g vs 187 g
  • Oppo Reno12 (China) has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno12 (China)
  • ✓2 g lighter (185 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
  • ✓6.67" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOppo Reno12 (China)Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Oppo Reno12 (China) Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.7"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 1080x2400 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Oppo Reno12 (China) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 8250 Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 SM6225-AD (6nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedQualcomm Adreno 610
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Oppo Reno12 (China) Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera SystemN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)Not listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno12 (China) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight185 g187 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Oppo Reno12 (China) wins — BeastScore 84.8/100

After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno12 (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 71.4 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.

Buy Oppo Reno12 (China) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 71.4 · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz

Buy Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) if you want

Balanced specifications with Oppo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Common questions

Which is better: Oppo Reno12 (China) or Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)?

Oppo Reno12 (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.8/100 compared to Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 71.4 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.

What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno12 (China) and Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)?

Oppo Reno12 (China) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Oppo Reno12 (China) and Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) compare for speed?

Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 86/100 for performance; Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 5G

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro XL 5G

OnePlus Pad Lite
Oneplus

OnePlus Pad Lite

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 Pro

vivo V29 Lite
Vivo

vivo V29 Lite

Oppo Pad SE
Oppo

Oppo Pad SE

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Oppo Reno10 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno11 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →