BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)8090
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A)8670
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) has the bigger screen6.51" vs 6.49"
- BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) is lighter198 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more)
More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) has a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) scores 80/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 13 Pro
BBK Vivo Y52t 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2166A (BBK V2166A) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture ShowdownASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)
We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →