BeastCompare

Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701): Which One Should You Buy?

Oppo Reno14 F 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 85.9/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oppo · 2025

Oppo Reno14 F 5G

Oppo Reno14 F 5G
86/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Oppo · 2025

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
73/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Oppo Reno14 F 5G wins 5 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Oppo Reno14 F 5G
Oppo Reno14 F 5G
5 wins
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Oppo Reno14 F 5GOppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedOppo Reno14 F 5G
    86
    80
  • CameraOppo Reno14 F 5G
    80
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOppo Reno14 F 5G
    95
    92
  • DisplayOppo Reno14 F 5G
    84
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueOppo Reno14 F 5G
    85
    68
Key differences
  • Oppo Reno14 F 5G has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh
  • Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.57"
  • Oppo Reno14 F 5G is lighter180 g vs 192 g
  • Oppo Reno14 F 5G has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno14 F 5G
  • ✓12 g lighter (180 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+200 mAh)
  • ✓6.57" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
  • ✓6.67" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOppo Reno14 F 5GOppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Oppo Reno14 F 5G Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.57"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (397 ppi)1080x2400 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Oppo Reno14 F 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 0 (28nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedUnknown mobile GPU
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Oppo Reno14 F 5G Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera SystemN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)Not listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno14 F 5G Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight180 g192 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68/IP69Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Reno14 F 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh5,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.1Not listed
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Oppo Reno14 F 5G wins — BeastScore 85.9/100

After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno14 F 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 85.9 vs top rival 72.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+200 mAh more).

Buy Oppo Reno14 F 5G if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 85.9 vs top rival 72.6 · Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+200 mAh more)

Buy Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) if you want

Balanced specifications with Oppo hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support

Upgrade guideOwn the Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)? Is upgrading to the Oppo Reno14 F 5G worth it?
Read the verdict →

Common questions

Which is better: Oppo Reno14 F 5G or Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?

Oppo Reno14 F 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 85.9/100 compared to Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 85.9 vs top rival 72.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+200 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?

Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a 6.57-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.

How do Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) compare for speed?

Oppo Reno14 F 5G scores 86/100 for performance; Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy A08
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A08

Apple iPhone 17e
Apple

Apple iPhone 17e

Pixel 10 Pro
Google

Pixel 10 Pro

OnePlus 10T
Oneplus

OnePlus 10T

Xiaomi 17T 5G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 17T 5G

vivo X300 E 5G
Vivo

vivo X300 E 5G

Oppo Reno15c 5G (India)
Oppo

Oppo Reno15c 5G (India)

Motorola Moto G17 Power
Motorola

Motorola Moto G17 Power

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Oppo Reno14 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Reno13 Pro

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A08

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)

Compare →
vs

Oppo Reno14 F 5G vs Apple iPhone 17e

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →