Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701): Which One Should You Buy?

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
71/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Oppo · 2025

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
73/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
0 wins
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    80
    80
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryOppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
    86
    92
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has the bigger battery5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
  • Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) is lighter177 g vs 192 g
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
  • ✓15 g lighter (177 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.7" display
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
  • ✓Bigger 5,800 mAh battery (+800 mAh)
  • ✓6.67" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationOppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAM-OLED displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size6.7"6.67"
Resolution & Density1080x2412 (394 ppi)1080x2400 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / Processor0 (28nm)0 (28nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsUnknown mobile GPUUnknown mobile GPU
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight177 g192 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh5,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) wins — BeastScore 72.6/100

After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 and Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more).

Buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) if you want

Lighter body: 177g (15g lighter in hand)

Buy Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 · Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more)

Common questions

Which is better: Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) or Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.6/100 compared to Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 and Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.

How do Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) compare for speed?

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) scores 80/100 for performance; Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open GateCamera
5 min read

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →