Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701): Which One Should You Buy?
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.6/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryOppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)8692
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has the bigger battery5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
- Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) is lighter177 g vs 192 g
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) wins — BeastScore 72.6/100
After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 and Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more).
Lighter body: 177g (15g lighter in hand)
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 · Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) or Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.6/100 compared to Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.6 vs top rival 71.4 and Larger battery capacity: 5,800 mAh (+800 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)?
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.
How do Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) and Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) compare for speed?
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) scores 80/100 for performance; Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)

iPhone 13 Pro Max
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24115RA8EG (Xiaomi Amethyst)

BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)

Oppo Reno13 F 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE EU AU V3 256GB CPH2699 (BBK 2699)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Reno11 Pro vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno11 (China)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Oppo Reno11 5G 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2599 (BBK 2599)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687) vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Oppo Reno14 F 5G
Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701) vs Reno13 Pro
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →