Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629): Which One Should You Buy?
Oppo Reno12 (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Oppo Reno12 (China) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedOppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)8690
- CameraOppo Reno12 (China)8060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayOppo Reno12 (China)8962
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueOppo Reno12 (China)8568
- Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) is lighter181 g vs 185 g
- Oppo Reno12 (China) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Oppo Reno12 (China) wins — BeastScore 84.8/100
After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno12 (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz
Lower launch price: $749 (save $Infinity)
Common questions
Which is better: Oppo Reno12 (China) or Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)?
Oppo Reno12 (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.8/100 compared to Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) (73.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno12 (China) and Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)?
Oppo Reno12 (China) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Oppo Reno12 (China) and Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) compare for speed?
Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 86/100 for performance; Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Oppo Reno10 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Oppo Reno11 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Reno13 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno14 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno 10 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Reno11 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Related articles
All articles →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →





