Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno12 Pro (China): Which One Should You Buy?
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) wins 3 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedOppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)9086
- CameraOppo Reno12 Pro (China)6080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayOppo Reno12 Pro (China)6289
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueOppo Reno12 Pro (China)6885
- Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) is lighter181 g vs 190 g
- Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
- Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has the faster chipDimensity 9200+ vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) wins — BeastScore 84.8/100
After comparing all the specs, Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
Lighter body: 181g (9g lighter in hand)
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) or Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)?
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.8/100 compared to Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) (73.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.8 vs top rival 73.9 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) and Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)?
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) and Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) compare for speed?
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) scores 90/100 for performance; Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) scores 86/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Reno13 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno14 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno 10 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Reno11 Pro vs Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
CameraOppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate
Oppo has confirmed the Find X10 Pro Max will pack twin 200MP sensors and cinema-grade Open Gate 4:3 full-sensor video recording for filmmakers.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →





