POCO F3 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS POCO F3 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | POCO F3 | Xiaomi Poco | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,520 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | 33W | Standard | 33W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | 48 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 6.67" | 6.67" | 6.67" |
| Chassis Weight | 196g | 181g | 181g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄POCO F3 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.3/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, POCO F3 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: POCO F3 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)
Which is better: POCO F3 or Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)?
POCO F3 leads with an overall BeastScore of 81.3/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) (73.9/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 81.3 vs top rival 73.9 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 0W.
What are the primary battery and display differences between POCO F3 and Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)?
POCO F3 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 4520 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) features a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between POCO F3 and Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, POCO F3 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
POCO F3 vs POCO F4
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 512GB 25053PC47I (Xiaomi Onyx)
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs POCO F6
POCO F4 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble)
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs POCO F5 Pro
POCO F3 vs Samsung Galaxy M13 (India)
Xiaomi Poco F5 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 23049PCD8G (Xiaomi Marble) vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
POCO F3 vs iPhone 17 Pro
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.








