Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt): Which One Should You Buy?
Redmi K60 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.8/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Redmi K60 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Redmi K60 Pro wins 3 of 6 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedRedmi K60 Pro9580
- CameraRedmi K60 Pro8460
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)9092
- DisplayRedmi K60 Pro8662
- ConnectivityTie6565
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has the bigger battery5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Redmi K60 Pro charges faster120W vs 67W
- Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) is lighter202 g vs 205 g
- Redmi K60 Pro has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
- Redmi K60 Pro has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 5G SM8550-AB vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Redmi K60 Pro wins — BeastScore 86.8/100
After comparing all the specs, Redmi K60 Pro is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.8 vs top rival 72.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 67W.
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.8 vs top rival 72.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 67W
Larger battery capacity: 5,500 mAh (+500 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Redmi K60 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)?
Redmi K60 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.8 vs top rival 72.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 120W vs max 67W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Redmi K60 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)?
Redmi K60 Pro has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery.
How do Redmi K60 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) compare for speed?
Redmi K60 Pro scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro 5G Lamborghini Squadra Corse Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 24127RK2CC (Xiaomi Miro)
Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5G Lamborghini Squadra Corse Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 23117RK66C (Xiaomi Manet)
Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Redmi K60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Redmi K60 Pro vs Apple iPad Air 13 5G (2026)
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →