Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 75.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) wins 1 of 6 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)8090
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie9292
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityTie6565
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) charges faster90W vs 67W
- Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) is lighter198 g vs 202 g
- Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
- Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) wins — BeastScore 75.1/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 75.1 vs top rival 72.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 67W.
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Higher overall BeastScore: 75.1 vs top rival 72.6 · Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 67W
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) or Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)?
Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) leads with an overall BeastScore of 75.1/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 75.1 vs top rival 72.6 and Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 67W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) and Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)?
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) and Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) compare for speed?
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A06

iPhone 17e
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 512GB GM66V (Google Rango)

OnePlus Ace 3V 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PJF110 (BBK Audi)

Xiaomi Mi 15T Pro 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB 2506BPN68G (Xiaomi Klimt)

V40e

Oppo Reno13 Pro 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN V2 256GB PKK110 (BBK 2697)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5G Lamborghini Squadra Corse Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 23117RK66C (Xiaomi Manet) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) vs Galaxy A06
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs iPhone 13 Pro Max
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →