Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake)
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)9080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake)7086
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) has the bigger battery5,160 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) has the bigger screen6.88" vs 6.49"
- Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) is lighter204 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs MediaTek Helio G81 MT6769
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,160 mAh (+760 mAh more).
More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 5,160 mAh (+760 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) or Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake)?
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,160 mAh (+760 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) and Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake)?
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) has a 6.88-inch display and 5160 mAh battery.
How do Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) and Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) compare for speed?
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco C75 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 64GB 24116PCC1I (Xiaomi Warm) vs Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Xiaomi Poco C75 2024 4G NFC Top Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2410FPCC5G (Xiaomi Lake) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →