Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)7260
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)7086
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,350 mAh
- Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has the bigger screen6.58" vs 6.52"
- Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) is lighter192 g vs 240 g
- Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has more RAM6 GB vs 3 GB
- Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 5G SM7635 vs Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) wins — BeastScore 66.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 3GB
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more)
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) or Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)?
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) and Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)?
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) has a 6.52-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) and Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) compare for speed?
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) scores 60/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y02s 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 EMEA 32GB V2203 (BBK V2203)
A17k
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Xiaomi Poco C61 4G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 2312BPC51H (Xiaomi Blue)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →