Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) wins 2 of 6 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)6460
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryXiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)9686
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityTie5555
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) charges faster18W vs 10W
- Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger screen6.71" vs 6.52"
- Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) is lighter192 g vs 204 g
- Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has more RAM4 GB vs 3 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 66.4 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 66.4 · Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more)
Lighter body: 192g (12g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) or Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)?
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) (66.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 69.4 vs top rival 66.4 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) and Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F)?
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has a 6.71-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) has a 6.52-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) and Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) compare for speed?
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) scores 64/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) scores 60/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)

iPhone 14 Plus
Pixel 6a

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Oppo Reno6 Lite 2022 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB CPH2365 (BBK 2219)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Xiaomi Poco C61 4G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 2312BPC51H (Xiaomi Blue)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Pixel 6a
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →