vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G vs vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2025

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
88/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G wins 2 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
2 wins
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5Gvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
    95
    91
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • Connectivityvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
    75
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G has the bigger battery8,000 mAh vs 6,400 mAh
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is lighter194.9 g vs 212 g
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G has newer Bluetooth6 vs 5.4
  • vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G has the faster chipDimensity 9400+ vs Dimensity 9300+
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G
  • ✓Bigger 8,000 mAh battery (+1,600 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
  • ✓17.099999999999994 g lighter (194.9 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5Gvivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak)AMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (453 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorDimensity 9400+ Dimensity 9300+
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 15Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory16 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight212 g194.9 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity8,000 mAh6,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandNot listed
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HDv5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1 and Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+1,600 mAh more).

Buy vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1 · Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+1,600 mAh more)

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you want

Significantly faster wired charging: 80W vs max 0W · Lighter body: 194.9g (17g lighter in hand)

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G or vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ (88.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1 and Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+1,600 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G has a 6.78-inch display and 8000 mAh battery. vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has a 6.78-inch display and 6400 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ 5G scores 95/100 for performance; vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ scores 91/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →