vivo iQOO Z9 (China) vs vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: Which One Should You Buy?

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9 (China)

vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
88/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) wins 1 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
1 win
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
vivo iQOO Z9 (China)vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • Speedvivo iQOO Z9 (China)
    95
    91
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    89
    89
  • ConnectivityTie
    65
    65
  • SecurityTie
    34
    34
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has the bigger battery6,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ charges faster80W vs 44W
  • vivo iQOO Z9 (China) is lighter188 g vs 194.9 g
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has the faster chipDimensity 9300+ vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ is better protected from water and dustIP64 vs IP54
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
  • ✓6.900000000000006 g lighter (188 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
  • ✓Bigger 6,400 mAh battery (+400 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo iQOO Z9 (China)vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.78"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (395 ppi)FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (453 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 (China) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 7 Gen 3 Dimensity 9300+
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 14
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo iQOO Z9 (China) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight188 g194.9 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP54IP64
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh6,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetoothv5.3v5.4
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

After comparing all the specs, vivo iQOO Z9 (China) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1.

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 (China) if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1

Buy vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ if you want

Larger battery capacity: 6,400 mAh (+400 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 80W vs max 44W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo iQOO Z9 (China) or vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.3/100 compared to vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ (88.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.3 vs top rival 88.1.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo iQOO Z9 (China) and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+?

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) has a 6.78-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ has a 6.78-inch display and 6400 mAh battery.

How do vivo iQOO Z9 (China) and vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ compare for speed?

vivo iQOO Z9 (China) scores 95/100 for performance; vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+ scores 91/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →
Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)Flagship Projector Shootout
16 min read

Hisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.

Read →
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)Prosumer NAS Flagship Shootout
14 min read

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus vs. Synology DiskStation DS923+ vs. QNAP TS-464 vs. Asustor Lockerstor 4 Gen3 (AS6804T): The Definitive Flagship 4-Bay NAS Architecture, 10GbE Networking, Intel Core i5 vs. AMD Ryzen vs. Celeron Silicon, Plex 4K Hardware Transcoding, M.2 NVMe Storage Pools, and Private Cloud OS Showdown (2026)

We stress-tested the four leading 4-bay prosumer NAS appliances across 10GbE multi-gig sequential throughput, Plex 4K HEVC/AV1 hardware transcoding, dual M.2 NVMe SSD storage pools, Docker container workloads, and OS security models. Here is the definitive data-driven benchmark breakdown.

Read →