Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water): Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi · 2022

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2023

Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)

Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) wins 1 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
1 win
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
    64
    72
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
    96
    86
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityTie
    60
    60
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) charges faster18W vs 10W
  • Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger screen6.71" vs 6.52"
  • Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) is lighter192 g vs 204 g
  • Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓6.71" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
  • ✓12 g lighter (192 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.52" display at 60 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayColor IPS TFT LCD display
Screen Size6.71"6.52"
Resolution & Density720x1650 (268 ppi)720x1600 (269 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorJLQ JR510 (11nm)Mediatek Helio (7nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G52Unknown mobile GPU
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage64GB128GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) Lightest Chassis
Dimensions169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mmN/A
Weight204 g192 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging18W wired fast charging10W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LEv5.0
USB Port & SpeedUSB Type-C 2.0Not listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100

After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).

Buy Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) if you want

Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more)

Buy Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) if you want

More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB · Lighter body: 192g (12g lighter in hand)

Common questions

Which is better: Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) or Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)?

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more).

What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) and Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)?

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has a 6.71-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) has a 6.52-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) and Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) compare for speed?

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) scores 64/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) scores 72/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →