Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus: Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus wins 4 of 6 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi Poco M6 Plus7291
- CameraXiaomi Poco M6 Plus6080
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayXiaomi Poco M6 Plus6289
- ConnectivityTie6565
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueXiaomi Poco M6 Plus6885
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus charges faster33W vs 18W
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has a smoother screen120 Hz vs 90 Hz
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has more RAM8 GB vs 6 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus wins — BeastScore 86.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 18W.
Balanced specifications with Xiaomi hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 69.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 18W
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) or Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.3/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 69.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 33W vs max 18W.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) and Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus?
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) has a 6.79-inch display and 5030 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has a 6.79-inch display and 5030 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) and Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus compare for speed?
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus scores 91/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) vs Xiaomi Poco M7
Xiaomi Poco M4 5G (India) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus 5G
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A08
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →





