Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus wins 5 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi Poco M6 Plus9180
- CameraXiaomi Poco M6 Plus8060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayXiaomi Poco M6 Plus8962
- ConnectivityXiaomi Poco M6 Plus6555
- SecurityTie3434
- ValueXiaomi Poco M6 Plus8568
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has the bigger battery5,030 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) charges faster67W vs 33W
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has the bigger screen6.79" vs 6.67"
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) is lighter179 g vs 205 g
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.2
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has the faster chipSnapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE vs Mediatek Helio
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) is better protected from water and dustIP54 vs IP53
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus wins — BeastScore 86.3/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 71.4.
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 71.4
Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 33W · Lighter body: 179g (26g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus or Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B)?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.3/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.3 vs top rival 71.4.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus and Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B)?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus has a 6.79-inch display and 5030 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus and Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) compare for speed?
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus scores 91/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus 5G
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G NFC Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2404APC5FG (Xiaomi Tides Moon)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A08
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 2312FPCA6G (Xiaomi Emerald B) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus vs Apple iPhone 17e
Related articles
All articles →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →