Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp): Which One Should You Buy?
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 76.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedXiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C)9590
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie9292
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) is lighter198 g vs 211 g
- Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) has more RAM16 GB vs 12 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) wins — BeastScore 76.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 76.4 vs top rival 75.1 and More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB.
Higher overall BeastScore: 76.4 vs top rival 75.1 · More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB
Significantly faster wired charging: 90W vs max 0W · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) or Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)?
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) leads with an overall BeastScore of 76.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) (75.1/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 76.4 vs top rival 75.1 and More system memory: 16GB RAM vs max 12GB.
What are the main battery and display differences between Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) and Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)?
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery.
How do Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) and Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) compare for speed?
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) scores 95/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A06

iPhone 16 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold UW 5G TD-LTE JP 512GB GM66V (Google Rango)

Open

Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 25067PYE3C (Xiaomi Luming)

BBK vivo X100 Ultra 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2366GA (BBK V2366)

Oppo Find X8 Pro 5G Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2659 (BBK 2659)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 25060RK16C / K80Ultr (Xiaomi Dali)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5G Lamborghini Squadra Corse Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 23117RK66C (Xiaomi Manet) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C)
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5G Lamborghini Squadra Corse Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 1TB 23117RK66C (Xiaomi Manet) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Extreme Edition Premium 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2407FRK8EC / K70 Ultra (Xiaomi Rothko C) vs Galaxy A06
Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp) vs Galaxy A06
Related articles
All articles →
Hardware PickExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?
ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.
Read →
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →