BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7): Which One Should You Buy?
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)8090
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryBBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)8670
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.49"
- BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) is lighter185.5 g vs 215 g
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
- Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has the faster chipQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AC vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 5G SM4450
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) wins — BeastScore 71.4/100
After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more)
More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB
Common questions
Which is better: BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) or Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+600 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7)?
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) has a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) and Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) compare for speed?
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) scores 80/100 for performance; Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
iPhone 13 Pro
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
OnePlus Nord 3 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2491 (BBK Vitamin)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)
BBK Vivo Y35+ 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2279A / Y35m+ (BBK V2279BA)
Oppo Reno12 F 4G NFC 2024 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V2 256GB CPH2687 (BBK 2687)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
BBK Vivo Y78 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
BBK Vivo Y100i 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB V2279A (BBK V2279A) vs BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-A566W Galaxy A56 5G 2025 Standard Edition TD-LTE CA 256GB (Samsung A566)
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs iPhone 13 Pro
Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 512GB (Samsung Q7) vs iPhone 13 Pro
BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Related articles
All articles →
Definitive Foldable Guide 2026Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)
A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.
Read →
Audiophile Flagship ReferenceSennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.
Read →
Flagship Projector ShootoutHisense PX3-PRO vs. Formovie Theater Premium vs. AWOL Vision LTV-3500 Pro vs. NexiGo Aurora Pro: The Definitive Flagship 4K Triple-Laser Ultra-Short Throw (UST) Projector Architecture, 3,000+ ANSI Lumens, 110% BT.2020 Color Space, Dolby Vision & HDR10+, 0.21:1 Throw Ratio, ALR Screen Pairing, and Home Theater Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive engineering and empirical benchmark teardown of flagship 4K triple-laser ultra-short throw projectors. We evaluate pure RGB laser diode arrays, Texas Instruments 0.47-inch DMD micro-mirror actuation, native vs. dynamic contrast ratios, ANSI lumen light output, BT.2020 wide color gamut coverage, Dolby Vision dynamic tone mapping engines, acoustic soundbars, and ambient light rejection performance.
Read →