BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) vs Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost): Which One Should You Buy?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2022

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)

Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
69/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
1 win
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
1 win
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
    72
    64
  • CameraTie
    60
    60
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryXiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
    86
    96
  • DisplayTie
    62
    62
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    68
    68
Key differences
  • Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has the bigger screen6.71" vs 6.56"
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is lighter185 g vs 204 g
  • BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
  • ✓19 g lighter (185 g), easier to hold
  • ✓6.56" display
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓6.71" display

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationBBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeColor IPS TFT LCD displayColor IPS TFT LCD display
Screen Size6.56"6.71"
Resolution & Density720x1612 (269 ppi)720x1650 (268 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835T (6nm)JLQ JR510 (11nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsARM Mali-G57MP2ARM Mali-G52
Operating SystemAndroid Android 11
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR4 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB64GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary CameraN/AN/A
Telephoto ZoomNot listedNot listed
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNot listedNot listed
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie LensN/AN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm
Weight185 g204 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A18W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listed5.0, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100

After comparing all the specs, BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB and Lighter body: 185g (19g lighter in hand).

Buy BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) if you want

More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB · Lighter body: 185g (19g lighter in hand)

Buy Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) if you want

Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+1,000 mAh more) · Significantly faster wired charging: 18W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) or Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB and Lighter body: 185g (19g lighter in hand).

What are the main battery and display differences between BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost)?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) has a 6.71-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.

How do BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) and Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) compare for speed?

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) scores 64/100.

Similar Smartphones

Related articles

All articles →
ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?Hardware Pick
9 min read

ExpressVPN Review (2026): Is the Premium Price Tag Worth It?

ExpressVPN costs more than most competitors. We tested its custom Lightway protocol, Aircove router integration, and British Virgin Islands legal standing.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)Lab Tested · Monitor Architecture Showdown
18 min read

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM vs. LG UltraGear 32GS95UE vs. Alienware AW3225QF vs. MSI MPG 321URX: The Definitive Flagship 4K 240Hz Gen 3 QD-OLED & Dual-Mode 480Hz WOLED Monitor Architecture, Sub-Pixel Text Clarity, G-Sync / FreeSync Premium Pro, Custom Heatsink Thermal Cooling, 0.03ms Response, and Burn-In Warranty Showdown (2026)

We benchmarked the top 32-inch 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitors across Gen 3 QD-OLED color volume, LG Micro Lens Array (MLA+) WOLED dual-mode 480Hz switching, sub-pixel text fringing, thermal dissipation heatsinks, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC vs HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, and 3-year burn-in warranties.

Read →