BeastCompare

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Which One Should You Buy?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges ahead with a BeastScore of 74.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi · 2014

Mi Pad 7.9

Mi Pad 7.9
68/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
74/ 100
Launch price$999
Head-to-head

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins 5 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Mi Pad 7.9
Mi Pad 7.9
2 wins
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
5 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivityValue
Mi Pad 7.9Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    60
    80
  • CameraMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    60
    72
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    40
    88
  • BatteryMi Pad 7.9
    96
    58
  • DisplayMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    62
    96
  • ConnectivityMotorola Razr 40 Ultra
    40
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueMi Pad 7.9
    68
    55
Key differences
  • Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger battery6,700 mAh vs 3,800 mAh
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper main camera12 MP vs 8 MP
  • Mi Pad 7.9 has the bigger screen7.9" vs 6.9"
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is lighter184.5 g vs 360 g
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 4
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM8 GB vs 2 GB
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Mi Pad 7.9
  • ✓Bigger 6,700 mAh battery (+2,900 mAh)
  • ✓8 MP main camera
  • ✓7.9" display
Reasons to buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • ✓175.5 g lighter (184.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓$9000 cheaper at launch ($999 vs $9999)
  • ✓12 MP main camera

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationMi Pad 7.9Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
1. Display & Screen🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Display
Screen typeIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorspOLED
Screen Size7.9"6.9"
Resolution & Density1536x2048 (324 ppi)2640x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz165 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,400 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorNot listed Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 730
Operating SystemAndroid Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 64GB256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Wins Camera
Primary Camera8 MP12 MP, f/1.7, OIS
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/A13 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens5 MP32 MP, f/2.4
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A170.8 x 74 x 7.1 mm
Weight360 g184.5 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP52
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Mi Pad 7.9 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,700 mAh3,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/A30W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed5W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP5.3
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0, USB HostUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$999
Our verdict

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra wins — BeastScore 74.3/100

After comparing all the specs, Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 68.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

Buy Mi Pad 7.9 if you want

Larger battery capacity: 6,700 mAh (+2,900 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 7.9" vs max 6.9" for media & multitasking

Buy Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 68.4 · Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W

Common questions

Which is better: Mi Pad 7.9 or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads with an overall BeastScore of 74.3/100 compared to Mi Pad 7.9 (68.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 74.3 vs top rival 68.4 and Significantly faster wired charging: 30W vs max 0W.

What are the main battery and display differences between Mi Pad 7.9 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

Mi Pad 7.9 has a 7.9-inch display and 6700 mAh battery. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display and 3800 mAh battery.

How do Mi Pad 7.9 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra compare for speed?

Mi Pad 7.9 scores 60/100 for performance; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)
Samsung

Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

iPhone 14 Pro
Apple

iPhone 14 Pro

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)
Google

Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)
Oneplus

OnePlus Ace 2V 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PHP110 (BBK Vitamin)

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi Mix Flip 2 5G Customized Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB 2505APX7BC (Xiaomi Bixi)

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y77t 5G 2023 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2278A (BBK V2278A)

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)
Oppo

Oppo Reno12 Pro 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 512GB CPH2629 (BBK 2629)

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung SM-S948U Galaxy S26 Ultra UW 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-S948A (Samsung Miracle 3)

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs iPhone 14 Pro

Compare →
vs

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro 5G UW TD-LTE US 1TB G1MNW (Google Husky)

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Motorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone DuoTeaser
4 min read

Motorola starts teasing its own wide foldable smartphone in response to the iPhone Duo

Motorola has published official teaser sketches of an upcoming wide-format book-style foldable aimed at competing directly with the iPhone Duo and Galaxy Fold.

Read →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Apple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design BreakdownHardware Analysis
12 min read

Apple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown

An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.

Read →