Android

Mi Pad 7.9Full Specs & Is It Worth It?

Name: Mi Pad 7.9
Brand: Xiaomi
SKU: mi-pad-7-9
Rating: 6.8 (185 reviews)

68.4/ 100

Great

68 / 100

BeastScore

2014-01-01

Buy it if

✓Long battery life — 6,700 mAh

2GB + 2GB2GB + 64GB

Full specs ↓

Key Specifications

Storage

2 GB

RAM

2 GB

Main Camera

8 MP

Front Camera

5 MP

Display

7.9" 1536x2048

Battery

6,700 mAh

Mi Pad 7.9 Full Specifications

Display & Screen
Display Type	IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Screen Size	7.9"
Resolution & Density	1536x2048 (324 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz
Brightness	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass
Platform & Performance
Processor / Chipset	High performance SoC
CPU	Multi-core
GPU	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android
Memory & Storage
RAM	2 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	2GB / 64GB
Storage Speed	High-speed storage
Cameras & Optics
Main Camera	8 MP
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None
Selfie Camera	5 MP
Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity	6,700 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A
Wireless Charging	No
Body & Build
Dimensions	Standard dimensions
Weight	360 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal frame
Water & Dust Resistance	Not certified
Connectivity & Ports
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP
USB	microUSB 2.0, USB Host
NFC	Yes

Similar Phones

Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

68 / 100

Apple · 2025

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)

68 / 100

Vivo · 2024

BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

69 / 100

Oppo · 2022

Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

68 / 100

Motorola · 2023

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

74 / 100

Head-to-Head: Mi Pad 7.9 vs the Competition

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Samsung SM-F761B Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung B7R)

Pad 7.9

(Samsung B7R)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Apple iPhone Air 1st gen 5G A3516 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Apple iPhone 18,4)

Pad 7.9

iPhone 18,4)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)

Pad 7.9

(Google Lynx)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)

Pad 7.9

(BBK 2343)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB 22041216UC (Xiaomi XagaPro)

Pad 7.9

(Xiaomi XagaPro)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 69

Mi Pad 7.9 vs BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)

Pad 7.9

(BBK V2346)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 68

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Oppo Reno 7 A 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 128GB A201OP (BBK 2353)

Pad 7.9

(BBK 2353)

Compare both phones→

vs68 – 74

Mi Pad 7.9 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Pad 7.9

40 Ultra

Compare both phones→

Related Articles & Guides

All articles →

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Update

4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

Definitive Foldable Guide 2026

14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

Audiophile Flagship Reference

15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.